Is striky actually mid in The Finals?

This is a parody endorsed by Striky, please check out Striky he is awesome https://www.twitch.tv/strikysplanet

Striky is a streamer from the made up land of Germany. He often plays the Finals on stream with a reversed baseball cap to hide his fading hair line. Striky has managed to achieve "Diamond", but is it worthy? Or is he as the zoomers call it just "Mid"?

Reaching Diamond rank, huh? That's like Striky becoming the Houdini of the gaming world, but instead of escaping from handcuffs, they're wriggling out of the clutches of "Just One More Game" syndrome. It's a test of endurance, strategy, and the sheer will to ignore the call of nature. Striky's journey to the top is less of a heroic saga and more of a "How long can I hold it in before my bladder becomes the next cashout?"

The Journey to Diamond: Skill or Stamina?

Striky hitting Diamond rank is like finding a vintage wine in your basement that you forgot about—it's surprisingly good, and you can't help but wonder, "How long has this been here?" At his mid-50s, Striky isn't just playing games; he's rewriting the rulebook on gamer age stereotypes. It's as if he's applying life wisdom to gaming strategies, like using his experience of navigating grocery store aisles on a Saturday to outmaneuver opponents in-game.

Competing in finals consistently is no small feat. It requires not only a deep understanding of the game but also the ability to perform under pressure, I'm sure thats not the only place he does that 😉. Striky's frequent appearances in these high-stakes matches suggest a level of consistency and mental fortitude that many gamers aspire to especially Ted. This consistent performance could be seen as an indicator of genuine skill, as it demonstrates his ability to compete with the best of the best on a regular basis.

The Volume of Play: Quantity vs. Quality

One could argue that Striky's success is a result of his extensive playtime. Its like when old people in a care home play chess a lot, they get kinda good at it. After all, practice makes perfect, and the more one plays, the better one becomes at understanding the nuances of the game. However, it's essential to differentiate between mindless repetition and deliberate practice. If Striky's approach to gaming involves actively learning from each match, analyzing his gameplay, and adapting his strategies, then his extensive playtime contributes significantly to his skill development rather than merely being a function of time spent.

However, there's another angle to consider. The gaming community often distinguishes between players who climb the ranks through sheer volume of play and those who achieve it with a more measured approach, highlighting efficiency and innate talent. The former, some argue, might reach high ranks as a function of persistence and time investment rather than a reflection of exceptional skill. This perspective suggests that while Striky's dedication is commendable, it might not necessarily mean they are 'good' in the sense of gaming excellence.

And let's not forget Striky's odyssey to Diamond rank. It's less about the destination and more about the journey—a saga of hitting the respawn button more times than one admits, learning the hard way that "Rush Cashout B" isn't a one-size-fits-all strategy, and discovering that true gaming enlightenment comes from knowing you'll never have to ask, "WHO THE HELL DIDNT CASHOUT IN TIME?" because the answer is most probably you or sometimes that Ortho guy.

Yet, what does it truly mean to be 'GUD' in competitive gaming? Does this mean you get loads of kills? Yes. Does this mean you can aim well? Yes. Does this mean you can do more healing than Ted in an Overwatch game (LOL yes). But none of this really matters, because like putting a Tortoise in a race, its about watching it believe its gonna win against all the other animals.

Do I lean towards the notion that Striky might actually be "mid" based on this? Given the factors at play, the answer tilts slightly towards yes, probably. The reasoning isn't solely predicated on the volume of gameplay, though it does play a significant role.

Striky's approach—relying heavily on persistence and an abundance of playtime—might suggest a certain level of proficiency that's commendable yet not extraordinary, but giving Diamond to Striky is like giving a gold medal to a 200 year old tortoise because it has existed for so long, however its still kinda impressive like when you find a chinese takeaway in your fridge which is still somewhat edible after two weeks.

So bravo Striky. You deserve Diamond. 👍

However, and perhaps more importantly, one might pause and ponder, "But who really cares?" does it matter if Striky is Mid? Bad? Or Good?

One thing is certain. At least he isn't as bad as Ted.